For instance, a food like chicken won’t have any sugar, but the score is saying 100/100. I find that really confusing because, is it referring to the fact that the sugar rating is out of 100, or is the food quality good because there’s no sugar? The same thing applies to glucose readings. It says that the exposure for a food is 10/100, but is that good or bad? Yes, the exposure was low, which is a benefit for blood sugar, or is it saying that out of 100 percent, it was bad?

Please make food scores more sensitive to things that provide vitamins and minerals such as sports drinks rather than just macros and calories. While it’s important to factor in all data points when I log a drink that has several vitamins and minerals I get a terrible food scores. While I agreed the drink doesn’t have much nutritional value it does provide important benefits. This could be considered for supplements also. I also have seen some low food scores for things I would expect to be considered healthy and vice versa. I don’t have any examples on hand right now though. I will attach an image of what I am referring to.

My morning oats had a score of 73 but pepsi had a score of 79. The scoring seems off. Can you double check this bit? The description feature also doesn’t pick up food accurately. Otherwise I love the convenience of having it all in one app.

Once again, thanks for version 2.0, it's great, but as we know, it still needs some improvement. The food quality and rating are excellent, but I noticed that it would be helpful to differentiate or rather take into account that a pre-workout meal with a high amount of carbohydrates is not the same as sugar, and it would be great if the program could consider this and ideally differentiate between the two. At the moment, I consumed water with protein and honey before running, and the meal quality was rated 53, even though the next meal after running was rated 83, the overall average is 66, which is quite low. The program could (it sees that the workout is done) analyze the amount of carbohydrates needed for the workout and consider them as the amount required to replenish glycogen. I am a runner, and today I ran 6.5 minutes at a T10 pace, so it was quite an intense run. I hope I expressed myself clearly.

I feel like the nutrition score only takes macros into consideration and not quality of food, perhaps it should be against macros and quality best of both worlds

I don’t know how nutri score is calculated but this might be wrong.

Please check screenshots.

Is Turkey Bacon healthier than Fresh Juice or Apple?