Some Nutrition scores and Food Quality Contributors don't make sense
planned (soon)
Ifti Hossain
Love the nutrition score feature, I've been logging food for just a few days and already it's helping me improve my eating habits. I was taking a close look at the scores of some of the foods I was logging however and it doesn't always make sense.
For example, a shot of espresso scores a 100/100 for Added Sugars, but there are are no sugars added to it. When I logged a tbsp of Honey, it scored a 1/100 for Added Sugars, and 62/100 for Sodium, even though in the nutrition label it showed 17g of Added Sugars and 0.8mg of Sodium. I'm noticing other cases where Sodium and Added Sugars may possibly getting mixed up? But not completely sure.
Also the Nutrition Score doesnt make sense for some items. A shot of whiskey has a 100/100 Nutrition Score but I would hardly think that alcohol should score so high. Honey similarly has a Nutrition Score of 2/100.
Amanda
planned (soon)
Randell
Merged in a post:
Bacon is apparently healthy
A
Andrew Murray
Bacon and Proscuitto both get scores of 100
Randell
Merged in a post:
Nutrition Value of Alcohol
Terry Franklin
I'm loving the idea of the Nutrition feature, but I'm not at all understanding why Bourbon shows as an "optimal" food quality of 100 when clearly it is not optimal.
Randell
Merged in a post:
Incorrect “Added Sugars” Score for Plain Espresso
Radoslav Oleksak
Hello,
I noticed an issue with the food quality scoring for plain espresso in the Bevel app. I logged a shot of high-quality espresso (without any sugar, milk, or other additions), but the app shows an “Added Sugars” score of 100/100.
Espresso, when consumed plain, does not contain added sugars. Its natural sugar content is negligible and comes from the coffee beans themselves. This seems to be a misclassification or a bug in the app’s database.
Attached is a screenshot showing the incorrect score. Could you please look into this and correct it?
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Best regards,
Randell
Merged in a post:
Cherry cola nutrition score 79
Stefan
I don’t believe it should have such a high nutritions score. If anything it should be at 0
Randell
Merged in a post:
Is a higher amount for added sugar score supposed to be better?
Dylan
My recipe has 100/100 added sugars... is there any way this could be worded better or is it actually referring to the fact there are so many added sugars. In which case it shouldn't get a nutrition score of 95.
Randell
Hi Dylan, For food logs with Nutrition scores that appears to inaccurate, we have a planned ticket for that. Let me merge this one for you.
The team will check on it as part of updating the Nutrition feature database. Thanks for reporting this!
Randell
Hi Stefan, Thanks for reporting.
We are aware of issues regarding the food scores on certain foods when you log them and we are working to fix/improve this, let me merge this to an existing ticket that we have for you.
Also, if you can, please do send a screenshot of it here. Thanks again!
Randell
Hi Radoslav Oleksak, Thanks for reporting this. We have an existing ticket for incorrect Food Quality scores and improvements to the Nutrition database. I'll merge this ticket for you.
Randell
Hi Andrew Murray, Thanks for reporting.
We are aware of issues regarding the food scores on certain foods when you log them and we are working to fix/improve this, let me merge this to an existing ticket that we have for you.
Load More
→